Eye in the Sky
“Eye
in the Sky” starring Dame Helen Mirren (my wife in a previous life) is a
current day military officer named Colonel Katherine Powell. She is an
established tough minded officer who early one morning from her home gets word ground
intelligence has had a sighting of a long pursued British-born woman who has converted
to Islam and moved to Africa to become an active radical terrorist.
Expeditiously,
Powell gets dressed in her uniform and arrives at her North of London base of
operation where she is in command of a top secret joint American drone
operation to capture terrorists hiding and operating in Africa. But upon her
arrival at the bunker operation new updated remote surveillance intelligence that
is corroborated with on-the-ground intelligence, reveals her target is now planning
to strike with massive suicide bombings that is about to occur very,
very soon.
Powell
quickly discerns her initial mission has moved from a simple raid of capture
and extradition to now an escalated operation for a potential “kill" order.
But just when the order is given early on to move away from a capture to now engaging
the enemy with a targeted missile strike, Nevada based American drone pilot Steve
Watts (Aaron Paul) discovers an innocent civilian nine-year old girl has entered
the kill zone radius. This dilemma of civilian casualties immediately triggers an
array of moral, ethical, military, strategic, legal and technical disputes and
questions between all level of higher ups encompassing the entire globe in both
the US and British levels of government. This leaves Colonel Powell in a
ticking clock lurch for an immediate answer to her dire and urgent question
which is to either kill or not kill before the loss of life of hundreds of
innocent civilians.
.
REVIEW: Initially the decision seems to be an
easy call by obtaining the necessary approval from the British higher-ups to
letting the Americans take out the terrorists. But Director Gavin Hood raises legitimate
questions with real hair raising tensions that is heightened by the robust verbal
exchange of probative questions and answers that are jousted about by the respective
layers of authoritative decisions makers from room to room, phone to phone and hotel
to hotel all in an intricate weave of various foreign locals.
“Eye
in the Sky” has an excellent and smartly executed screenplay that is strongly rooted
in modern warfare lingo as well as political and lawyer speak. What hampers it
somewhat from being a perfect film is that the same well written dialogue sometimes
felt like it went over and over some of the same areas of concerns for purely manipulative
exaggerated melodrama affect whereas to embellish the emotional and moral quandary
as to “what should we do”.
There
is no escaping the narrow undercurrent of the films political vein that runs
through its plot, but it’s impact is minimum as it never really gets in the way
of the films overall strength and goal of projecting gripping intrigue. “Eye in the Sky” is a thoroughly engaging, riveting
and provocative drama, bathed quite believably in real time strategic intelligence
of what, when and how decisions are made every second of the day as we civilians
unknowingly go about our routine days more preoccupied with texting, eating ice
cream at the mall and going to the movies.
Ultimately,
“Eye” is solidly sober and solidly sharp about the nature of global threats we
read and hear about every day, but sometimes soon forget when something minimally
comes along to take our thoughts away from the gloomy aftermath of death and destruction.
It also showcases very well the quiet
and stealthy crucial role western societies must constantly be vigilant in gathering
intelligence as the critical means of helping those officials and officers into
making the right and tough decisions that always seems to intersect at the crossroads
of security, legalities and ethics.
But
the larger message of the film was so eloquently stated by the fine and late British
Actor Alan Rickman when he says……..”Once
the decision is made, no one ever gets to question a soldier the cost of war”.
3 – 3/4 Stars
No comments:
Post a Comment