Saturday, September 10, 2016

Sully - Review

Sully

It’s Thursday January 15, 2009 at 3:27 PM and it’s a typically cold wintery day in New York City. And while 8 years have passed, no one in that city will ever forget the tragic events of 9/11 regardless the span of time. No doubt nerves were probably still raw and frayed from the emotional devastation of seeing 3000 plus civilians being murdered by terrorists who had commandeered two commercial jets in order to slam them into the World Trade Center Buildings. The unforgettable smell of fuel and the sounds of jet engines flying slowly and low over the skyline of NY City that day had indelibly etched their impact into the collective hearts and conscience of everyone who lived and worked in New York forever.

And yet on this day, this very specific new day and time, citizens of NY looked towards the sky again to a familiar sight and sound to wondered briefly were the horrors of 9/11 about to repeat itself when from the direction of LaGuardia Airport a low flying jet with smoke coming from its fuselage could be seen over the city’s skyline. An Airbus 320A US Airways jet to be specific could be seen careening at very low altitude heading towards the city’s population center to possibly cause death and destruction all over again. However what little did anyone know in that brief moment was what they were actually seeing was not a terrorist attack but instead the witnessing of what later became to be called the “Miracle on the Hudson” where 40 year plus pilot Captain “Sully” Sullenberger (Hanks) glided his terribly disabled commercial jet onto the frigid icy waters of the Hudson River, saving all 155 lives aboard. And for that one brief moment, the city collectively had something to cheer about and a Captain named Sully Sullenberger to praise as a national hero. Or was he? Sully was being heralded by the public and the media for his unprecedented feat of aviation skill, while an investigation was unfolding that threatened to destroy his reputation and his career. This is the story of “Sully”.

REVIEW: Director Clint Eastwood has a reputation just like the Airbus jet in this film is to always pace his films story telling with an effective and efficient easy slow and low approach. Meaning he never goes for the cheap gimmicky scenes just to gas up his films. He lets the story tell itself in its more actual reality of good people simply trying to do the best they can under extremely difficult circumstances. And in that regard I found “Sully’ to very satisfying entertainment. But in his effort to getting the story just right, I felt in the first 30 minutes the writing felt like nothing more than a bureaucratic gottcha slog (a backstory surprise to me) of how higher ups at the NTSB, particularly the investigators who were charged to finding out what happened that day, had very high suspicions and grave doubts about Capt. Sully accounts of that day. Specifically they believed from simulators and computer data Sully made terribly miscalculations in his judgement and was negligent in his duties in those first two minutes or he was just simply physically and or emotional ill-equipped to ever be a commercial pilot again.

The film Sully itself overall is solidly strong, but what makes the film even better is Tom Hanks. Once again Hanks captures (in my mind) the real face of American heroism as he impressively achieves a portrayal of a good man whose heroism was made of the right stuff on a day while facing looming unprecedented peril. Hanks in my mind deserves another Oscar Nomination for Best Actor as it is along with Jeff Bridges are two of the best performances I have seen this year. My guess he won’t get it because the film a few times (with the exception of the last 40 minutes) felt a bit dialog thin; overly stretched if you will for its 96 minutes running time.

Still I highly recommend you see Sully on the screen as Eastwood does make overall Sully one of the better mainstream films I have seen this year. But the real star, the real reason the film soars, the real reason I will remember this story is Tom Hanks.

4 times in Hanks career I believe he has captured in my mind what truly an American hero really looks and sounds like. Whether it was with Commander Jim Lovell in outer space , (“Apollo 13”), or on land with Captain John H. Miller (“Saving Private Ryan”), or on water with Captain Richard Phillips (“Captain “Phillips”) or in air with Captain Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger (“Sully”), Hanks always seems to inject the right tone, the right look, the right expressive face and the right human emotion of what leadership looks like under dangerous and trying circumstances.

You forget Hanks is actor when he is on the screen, because he is more that his title. He is an American gift to our consciousness that humanity and decency along with courage and self-sacrifice can co-exist in the same body at the same time.

Bravo Tom Hanks, Bravo.


3 - 3/4 Stars

Friday, September 9, 2016

Lester’s 25 Favorite Aviation Movies of All Time


Lester’s 25 Favorite Aviation Movies of All Time
Air Force One - 1997
Airplane – 1980
Apollo 13 – 1995
Bat 21 – 1988
Broken Arrow – 1996
Catch 22 – 1970
Con Air - 1997
Executive Decision - 1996
Flight -2012
Flight Plan - 2005
Fly Away Home – 1996
Midway - 1976
Red Eye - 2005
The Aviator – 2004
The Concorde – Airport 1979
The Fight of the Phoenix – 1965
The Great Waldo Pepper – 1975
The Hindenburg – 1975
The Right Stuff – 1983
The Spirit of St Louis – 1957
The Tuskegee Airmen - 1995
Top Gun – 1986
Tora, Tora, Tora – 1970
Twelve O’clock High – 1949
United 93 – 2006
 
 

Saturday, August 13, 2016

Hell or High Water - Review

Hell or High Water

Directed by David Mackenzie and written by Taylor Sheridan who pinned screenplays to “Sicario” and the former long running FX series “The Sons of Anarchy”, their new collaborative effort brings us the film “Hell or High Water” which was initially titled “Comancheria”. That name refers to the commonly used expression to describe the dry arid region of West Texas near New Mexico. Historically that area was largely occupied by the Comanche tribe before the 1860s. Now set in modern day this is where the film’s story begins.

Plot: Brothers “Toby” (Chris Pine from Star Trek) and “Tanner” (Ben Foster from 3:10 to Yuma, Alpha Dog and Phone Booth) are close knit, but like all families they are not without their problems in life. Toby is a divorced father who's trying to make a better life for his sons. His brother Tanner is an ex-convict with a bit of a temper and a loose aggressive trigger finger. But even with their occasional displays of sibling rivalry and verbal put downs there is no doubt they love each other and would do anything for one another to keep the family ranch before the bank takes it. They conclude that the only way to prevent their lost is to carefully plan a series of heists against the very bank chain that's about to foreclose on their family ranch.

Standing in their way is a Texas Ranger named Marcus (Jeff Bridges) a gruff, grizzly and gravelly talking man who’s voice alone suggest…………  “Seen that, heard that, done that”. But Ranger Marcus is on the retirement clock, so before these robberies occurred he had hoped he would be on a relative smooth transition to hanging up his badge soon. But as the siblings plot their next robbery, this crafty old lawman gets re-energize by their case and is now not so ready to ride off into the sunset.

Review: Words and expressions like authentic, smart, old fashion, genuine, enormous, in the moment and out right thrilling are the initial thoughts that come to my mind. And while you may have seen several bank robbing movies before, this feels different. Mostly as a result of the writing and the acting which together makes all of these characters feel grounded and realistic in their camaraderie. And whether it is between the two brothers or their pursuers in Ranger Marcus and his partner (half Mexican – half Comanche) Ranger Alberto Parker, the words they direct to one another feel like soft poetry to the movie’s plot. Dialogue that is skillfully put to paper that captures both the real cadence and colloquial conversational rhythms of a western region without being a western tale. Instead “HoHW” is a humanistic tale where the two principle brothers are indeed doing bad things, they are not bad men. They may be wrong for breaking the law, their intentions are not evil. They may be actually criminals of the first order, they are not morally defective or without a conscious.

“HoHW” execution is just terrific from beginning to end. There are moments of real tension and anxiety as well as biting zinging humor with an appropriate amount of current social commentary.  And if that wasn’t enough virtually every visual scene on the screen is breathtaking and gorgeous to look at, along with every conversational exchange memorable to listen to.

Overall this Southwest story is fresh, griping, exciting, tender and honest, as well as at times filled with genuine dramatic action and anger for the entire 1:40 minutes running time. In addition, “HoHW” delivers stellar performances all round including Chris Pine (his best work) and Jeff Bridges as the sarcastic political incorrect Texas Ranger; Oscar nominations could come both their ways. But I do hope the Academy remembers Ben Foster’s performance as the older brother. His work here as “Tanner” was simple scary good as well as “scary and good”.

I swear I wish Hollywood would make more films like this. Films that are able to take us on a thrilling ride through the grandeur of a land that seems wide, spacious and empty; seemingly almost devoid of human activity or life. But just as I found with “HoHW” upon closer examination for the few people who do actually reside in the nooks and crannies of life’s spacious places they too can have as much emotional intimacy and human appeal as any other earthly location.

No spoilers here, just in the first minute - the very first 60 seconds I knew this film would be great. You see the brothers driving up in a Blue Pontiac to rob a bank. On the street they are coming down is a bank and on the other side is a church with three black crucifixes on the wall. The church wall is in plain view even while they are in the bank. My guess, an opening moral metaphor to the film’s overall story, which is no matter how well intentioned the two brothers motives may be, they chose the side of the street that leads to temptation, which in the end haven’t we all in some way or another struggled with that same moral   dilemma at some point in our own lives?

This is the best film I have seen thus far for 2016. Make a point to see it, not through Redbox or through Netflix, but in the theater. Do what you can to get there, come “Hell or High Water” see it, you’ll be glad you did.


4 Stars

Friday, August 12, 2016

Florence Foster Jenkins - Review


Florence Foster Jenkins

Meryl Streep and Hugh Grant are cast in the true story of a very nice, lovely and wealthy woman who was a committed benefactor to the arts and who also equally loved to perform (act). But her larger dream was to one day to be able to sing alone on the big stage, the only problem is she happens to be a very bad singer and doesn’t know it. Still undeterred she hopes to fulfill her enduring lifelong dream of singing at the biggest performance stage of them all; at Carnegie Hall. This is the story of “Florence Foster Jenkins”.

The film itself, "FFJ" takes place around the 1940’s during the backdrop of World War 2 in New York City. It has an enchanting, very funny (appropriately so) and tender quality to its execution about this unique couple’s loving relationship even though at times the relationship operated under an unusual umbrella of secrets and sad personal history.

Overall “FFJ” has an authentic “old” movie feel about it with its carefully crafted rich and subtle details from the customs and wardrobes and musical selections to the overall set design. But while the film may have had a dated quality about it to the visual eye, there is an homage to the importance of social etiquette through the exalting prism of personal virtues that matter then and even today; graciousness, gentleness, dignity, encouragement, respect and sincerity.

Once again, Meryl Streep is absolutely prenominal as Florence as it will probably land her a record 20th Oscar nomination, which is staggering in itself. But perhaps even more surprising is that her co-star in the film, Huge Grant has never even been nominated once. Well, in my opinion he absolutely deserves a Best Supporting Actor Nomination here as the genuinely devoted husband, muse, confidant and best friend to the Mrs. Foster. Hugh Grant was just splendid from the film’s beginning to the emotional and moving finale. He holds his own with Meryl in every frame and much, much more.

‘FFJ” is such a sweet little film to enjoy. I was enthrallingly captivated - enthrallingly charmed.

3 -3/4 Stars

Saturday, August 6, 2016

Suicide Squad - Review

Suicide Squad

Principally starring Will Smith as “Deadshot”, Jared Leto as “The Joker” and, Margot Robbie as “Dr. Harleen F. Quinzel aka Harley Quinn”, the highly, highly  anticipated “Suicide Squad” opened this weekend under the unfortunate weight of reviews that were, shall I say not very flattering. Well, I for one was really hoping for a good imaginative piece of new entertainment here, so I chose to buck my pretty reliable “Rotten Tomato opinion score and be the sacrificial lamb to assess this film for myself.   

As you all probably know the plot revolves around an urgent and desperate need by the federal government to assemble a team of the world’s most dangerous, incarcerated Super Villains. Led by a U.S. federal intelligence officer named Amanda Waller (Viola Davis) and group leader Captain Rick Flagg, together they convened this incarcerated criminal group of disparate, despicable individuals with absolutely nothing to lose. They would be provided with the most powerful arsenal at the government’s disposal with the goal of sending this “odd squad” off on a mission to defeat an enigmatic, insuperable entity with the small chance of them of surviving.

REVIEW: The “RT” score of 26 is a tad low in my opinion as I was never really bored. It’s problem is simply with the Director who I think could not squeeze in that many characters into a 2 hour – 10 minute time frame and give them all some degree of plot relevance. So he (Director David Ayer) gave them something to do and say that was forgettable. Analogy speaking, it would be like me stopping to check air pressure on one obvious low tire and then subsequently stop and checking all four tires every five miles for pressure just because you want the other 3 tires to get some attention. The result is a chaotic hodge-podge of action scenes that really never take you anywhere of importance and dialogue of supporting cast who have absolutely no real importance to the overall film, the overall moment or the overall plot itself…………..Suicide Squad is burdened by being a squad.

WHAT THEY SHOULD HAVE DONE was have the story evolve around Will Smith, Margot Robbie and Jared Leto characters and then I believe you would have had a more interesting and thrilling effort.

Smith and Robbie had natural chemistry together and Leto was a good enough Joker (Heath Ledger Joker is still the best ever). Smith in particular had some smart, funny and interesting scenes – he was very engaging and seemed real. The result was his acting created the much depth and humanity to this film that was severely lacking throughout. Smith was especially effective when he and Robbie’s character were engaged in funny sarcastic banter aka “Harley Quin” and vice versa to his “Deadshot”. NOTE TO FUTURE CONSIDERATION, Smith’s “Deadshot” has enough depth where a real movie could actually revolve solely around him.

Overall “SS” is forgettable. Mostly because it’s just visually messy from the weight of way too many fire fights, too many moving parts and too many humans and “things” that don’t add up to much – just too many supporting “SS” characters you end up caring less about. Structurally SS feels terribly bloated by a screenplay that awkwardly transitions into frantic kinetic action sequences as a substitute for real emotional substance.

If there is a sequel I would offer to the producers the following suggestion. First there is a lot of promise in this odd ball group of miscreants working meaningfully well together but I suggest they just pair it down to 3 bat “sh%t crazy” personalities as they purse a good cause. And secondly get a better Director and screen writer who won’t treat the promise of a good idea as “business as usual - throw up against the wall - see if something sticks” format.

“Suicide Squad”, there are some hints of a better movie here but you have to be smarter next time not to overloaded it for it to ultimately materialized. Sometimes less is more.

2 – 1/2 Stars

Saturday, July 30, 2016

Jason Bourne - Review

Jason Bourne

It’s only appropriate that the film “Jason Bourne” starts out with him bareknuckle boxing, somewhere in remote Greece probably not too far from where we first saw him floating in the Mediterranean in ‘The Bourne Identity”. After all it has been his boxing skills, plus a high IQ and quick agility to extricate  and escape impossible circumstances that overall has made the JB series one of the more perplexing and popular espionage film characters.

So with this array of well-developed and honed attributes we have followed the gone rogue CIA agent for 12 years now as he attempts to survive on the run from a range of international assassins under the authority of the CIA who simply want him (for better or worse) dead.  And if you exclude that cinematic hiccup in 2012 starring Jeremy Brenner in “The Bourne Legacy” playing  a similar  super CIA Agent on the run named Aaron Cross, the overall legacy of 3 of the 4 “Bourne films” have had Matt Damon at the helm with the results always being spectacular, thrilling and smart entertainment. So, you ask what has Jason been up to.

PREMISE: Starring Matt Damon, Tommy Lee Jones, recent Oscar winner Alicia Vikander (The Danish Girl), and Vincent Cassel (Ocean 13 and The Black Swan) it’s been nine years after his disappearance from New York at the conclusion of The Bourne Ultimatum. In 2016 we find Jason Bourne unexpectedly resurfacing at a time when the world is faced with unprecedented instability through the back drop of US agencies wrestling with the need for national security at all cost verses personal privacy at all cost. At the same time, a new program has been created to hunt Jason down while he is still trying to find all the answers to his past and family, which as in the past has essentially left him without answers as to who he was and who he is now.

REVIEW: It’s so good to see this franchise revived at the hands of Director Paul Greengrass who directed Supremacy and Ultimatum. From the onset Greengrass appropriately makes it clear our Jason is a weary and tired man as he looks like someone worn down from having to look over his shoulders 24 -7 with advancing gray hair and wrinkles around the eyes. Jason is approaching middle age before our eyes.

But in short order Greengrass takes us on a typical Bourne chase sequence about 30 minutes into the film with the intent (I guess) of capturing the same brilliant chaotic crispness and magical intrigue from the previous films. Instead it felt like a simple retread from “The Bourne Ultimatum’ boarding purely on “Bourne Redundancy”. And yet after that minor miscue the film does settle down to be better than it started. Why?

Well, because of Matt Damon of course, which makes the Jason Bourne film the best action thriller I have seen this year. And while it is not as edgy in the past – maybe not as passionate in the past and in fact even a bit more subdued than in the past, it still works.

Yeah I know Rotten Tomato has it underwater with a score of 59, but for me it still has terrific chase sequences, terrific fight scenes, smart uses of cyber technology and a smart easy plot pace to follow. And while some scene transitions seem a bit out laddish just like in “Star Trek Beyond” it is still just fun to watch.

Furthermore Damon owns the DNA of this character as the laconic, restless, emotionally wounded and personally conflicted Jason Bourne. He is like a “Dark Knight” figure of real flesh and blood minus any reliance on a bullet proof fancy suit or a souped up car or unusual electronic devices to help him survive. It’s all mental acuity and physical instincts on full display with JB and a concise and precise joy to see.

Ultimately with all of the previous Bourne efforts, its all about Jason. Why, because we root for someone who seems underneath like a good guy inspite of the fact the entire world seems to want him dead.

See Jason Bourne – “The Bourne Remastered”.


3 – 1/2 Stars

Thursday, July 28, 2016

MOVIE SEQUELS GREENLIGHTED FOR PRODUCTION


MOVIE SEQUELS GREENLIGHTED FOR PRODUCTION
 
Alien: Covenant / Prometheus 2
Alien: Covenant 2 / Prometheus 3
Alien: Covenant 3 /Prometheus 4
Alien 5 (Sigourney Weaver and Michael Biehn – Picks up after 1986 Aliens)
Avatar 2
Avatar 3
Avatar 4
Avatar 5
Bad Boys 3 and 4
Bad Santa 2
Beetlejuice 2
Beverly Hills Cop 4
Bill & Ted 3
Blade Runner 2
Cars 3
Cheech and Chong
Chronicles of Narnia: The Silver Chair
Chucky 7
Clerks III
Deadpool 2
Despicable Me 3
Die Hard 6 / Die Hard: Year One
District 10 (aka District 9)
Dodgeball 2
Edge of Tomorrow 2
The Equalizer 2
Fast & Furious 8
Fifty Shades Darker/Fifty Shades Freed
Frozen 2
G.I. Joe 3
Godzilla 2
Godzilla Vs King Kong
Goonies 2
Gremlins 3
Guardians of the Galaxy 2
Halloween Returns
Hellboy III
High School Musical 4
Hotel Transylvania 3
How to Train Your Dragon 3
The Incredibles 2
Indiana Jones 5
Jack Reacher 2
John Wick: Chapter Two
The Jungle Book 2
Jurassic World 2
Jurassic World 3
Kingsman: The Golden Circle
Kingsman: The Secret Service 3
Layer Cake 2
The Legend of Conan
Mad Max 5
Mary Poppins 2
Men in Black 4
Mission: Impossible 6
Predator 4 - The Predator
Rambo: Last Blood
Riddick 4
Rounders 2
Rush Hour 4
Salt 2
Sicario 2 confirmed as Soldado.
Spaceballs 2
Space Jam 2 (Lebron James)
Stargate 2 - 4
Star Wars: Episode VIII and IX
Taken 4
Terminator: Genisys 2 and 3
Thor 3
Three Stooges 2
Top Gun 2
Toy Story 4
Trainspotting 2
Transformers 5, 6, 7, & 8
Triplets (Schwarzenegger, DeVito and E. Murphy are biological brothers)
TRON 3
Underworld: Next Generation
The Wolverine 3
World War Z 2
Wreck-It Ralph 2
xXx 3
Zombieland 2
Zootropolis 2